We are entering a strange point in human history. Seeing is no longer enough to establish what is real.
Think about that for a second.
People. Photography. Artwork. News. Music. Social media personalities. Performers. Voices. Videos.
Almost everything we consume through a screen now comes with a new, mostly unspoken question:
Is this real?
I recently watched a YouTube video from Chase Hughes that got me thinking about consciousness, perception, and the reality we experience. His discussion sent me down my own rabbit hole, and somewhere between consciousness and artificial intelligence, two ideas I had been thinking about separately suddenly collided.
AI creates uncertainty about what is real outside of us.
Consciousness creates uncertainty about who is experiencing reality inside of us.
And somewhere between those two questions sits this strange moment we are living through.
Who Made This?
I can show you a photograph of a woman who never existed. I can create a singer who never sang. I can generate a beautiful landscape nobody ever visited.
A voice can speak words its supposed owner never said. A performer can have millions of views without ever standing in front of a microphone.
So now I find myself asking different questions.
Who made this?
Who performed this?
Who experienced this?
Was there a photographer behind the camera?
Was there a singer behind the voice?
Was there an artist holding the brush?
Or was somebody simply good at prompting a machine?
That last question fascinates me.
Because our language around creativity is beginning to change too.
Nice Prompt, Bro.
For centuries, we praised the craft.
“Beautiful painting.”
“Great photograph.”
“What a voice.”
“Great performance.”
Now we have somehow reached a point in civilization where the compliment might essentially become:
“Damn. Excellent sentence you typed into the machine.”
Nice prompt, bro.
It sounds funny. I originally thought of it almost as a joke.
The more I thought about it, though, the less funny it became.
“Nice prompt” is almost another way of saying:
Cool illusion.
Impressive simulation.
You made me believe it for a second.
But there is another layer.
It questions authorship.
If someone spends hours developing an idea, directing an AI system, rejecting dozens of generations, refining the concept and eventually producing something powerful, who created the finished work?
The person?
The machine?
Both?
Neither?
And does the distinction matter?
I don’t think we have settled those questions yet. I also don’t think pretending the questions are simple gets us anywhere.
The Observer
This is where AI unexpectedly connects with something else I have been exploring lately: consciousness.
We spend most of our lives experiencing reality without stopping to ask who exactly is experiencing it.
Thoughts appear.
Emotions appear.
The body moves.
Memories surface.
Something seems to be aware of all of it.
I call myself “I.”
But what exactly is the “I” observing everything?
That question has existed for thousands of years. AI adds a bizarre modern companion to it.
If consciousness asks:
Who is observing?
AI asks:
What exactly are you observing?
One question points inward.
The other points outward. And now we are standing between them.
Can AI Become Conscious?
One of the biggest questions surrounding artificial intelligence is whether AI will eventually become conscious.
I find myself approaching the question differently.
AI came from human consciousness.
We imagined it.
Designed it.
Trained it on human language, art, knowledge, behavior and expression.
So perhaps the more interesting question isn’t simply whether the machine will become conscious.
Perhaps it is what AI teaches us about our own consciousness.
We built something capable of imitating pieces of human expression so convincingly that we have started questioning whether the expression itself requires a human being.
That should make us think.
Not panic.
Think.
What’s Real Anymore?
I use AI.
I enjoy AI.
I create with it.
This very idea grew partly from experimenting with what these systems allow us to make.
So this isn’t an anti-AI argument.
It is an argument for awareness.
I don’t want to lose my ability to question what I am seeing simply because the illusion has become convincing.
Maybe “Nice Prompt” becomes my little reminder.
I see the illusion.
I appreciate the creation.
But I am no longer automatically assuming what I am seeing is real.
Because we have entered an age where seeing isn’t always believing.
And perhaps the most important skill we develop next won’t be learning how to create better artificial realities.
It will be remembering to ask who created them, why they were created, and what remains real when the screen goes dark.
Nice prompt, bro.
Now tell me who made it.
Leave a comment